• conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    FTA: "However, I will say that the social media brigading just makes me not want to have anything at all to do with your approach.

    "Because if we have issues in the kernel development model, then social media sure as hell isn’t the solution. The same way it sure as hell wasn’t the solution to politics.

    “Technical patches and discussions matter. Social media brigading - no thank you.” -Linus

    Yeah, I have to issue an unqualified agreement here. Linus isn’t saying no to Rust, he’s smackin’ that ass for bringing drama out into social media instead of working through it in normal technical discussion channels.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      It sounds like he tried that, and nobody with authority responded until he went outside the list. Even now, Linus hasn’t actually answered the question of whether more rust code should be allowed.

      • Preston Maness ☭@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Martin seems to understand that adding a second language to the kernel is not only a technical concern, but a political one as well. Everyone else wants to pretend politics isn’t at play and that their objections are “purely technical.” They aren’t. I definitely understand Martin’s frustration here.

  • Gayhitler@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250108122825.136021-1-abdiel.janulgue@gmail.com/

    Here’s the source thread.

    Tldr: someone wants to put rust in the dma part of the kernel (the part that accesses memory directly)(it’s a memory allocator abstraction layer written in rust which rust code can use directly instead of dealing with the c allocator abstraction layer), is told that rust should use the extant methods to talk to the c dma interface, replies that doing so would make rust programs that talk to dma require some more code, gets told “that’s fine. We can’t do a split codebase”. The two parties work towards some resolution, then hector martin comes in and acts like jerk and gets told to fuck off by Linus.

    Martin is no lennart poettering but I don’t try to see things from his perspective anymore.

    It’s worth noting that Linus’ “approval” of rust in the kernel isn’t generally seen as a blanket endorsement, but a willingness to see how it might go and rust people have been generally trying to jam their code everywhere using methods that rival the cia simple field sabotage manual.

    I don’t think it’s on purpose (except for maybe Martin) but a byproduct of the kernel maintainers moving slowly but surely and the rust developers moving much faster and some seeing the solution to that slow movement as jamming their foot in the door and wedging it open.