

101·
2 days agoThe title is ‘internet’, implying a network of networks. The title wasn’t ‘new record in data transmission speed’.
The title is ‘internet’, implying a network of networks. The title wasn’t ‘new record in data transmission speed’.
The actual source: www.nict.go.jp
Not really an ‘internet’ world speed record, but really a wired data transmission record if I’m reading correctly.
I love how they went into so much detail about why the old numbers would be accurate, then proceed to say they can ‘safely’ say that windows has lost 400 million users over a sentence on a blog stating windows has ‘over a billion users’.
No source for the blog post. Here it is: windows blog
Note that the number has been updated, and at the bottom they state that that figure has been updated.
The original text said ‘over a billion’. 1.4 billion is over a billion.
Of course I read it, and investigated the source. The issue is with the title the article chose.