• toad31@lemmy.cif.su
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      Yeah, never forget how the people in power routinely gave Epstein a pass because they were participating in raping kids.

      All this “for the children” is performative bullshit to take more power away from the average person.

  • Lembot_0004@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Stop ministers making laws to… why the fuck they even do this bullshit? They are a government, they know everything about everyone even without such primitive control methods.

    • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      The people pulling the strings have obviously decided that internet freedom is a threat to them and they’re taking (global) action to ensure their supremacy.

  • Photuris@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    14 days ago

    We didn’t see this one coming a mile away.

    Palantir execs and shareholders are buzzing with anticipation.

  • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 days ago

    It’s a bit like “my kids will only eat chocolate” and the therapist’s response “where are they getting the chocolate from?”. If the kids are using VPNs then where are they getting the money for the VPN from? Is this parental consent?

      • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        Which is an anticipated problem too. Because those free VPNs are harvesting all of your traffic to sell; If you’re not the customer, you’re the product being sold. Almost as if opponents of the ban said this would happen, and would only work to push kids towards sketchy sites…

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 days ago

      Seriously though. We’ll legislate anything to keep them from seeing stuff they might reasonably expect to see and do one day and glorify things nobody should ever see or experience in person.

    • Quazatron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 days ago

      I’ve always been fascinated by the lengths puritans will go to prevent kids from seeing mammary glands, while simultaneously being ok with them watching blood and violence.

      • toad31@lemmy.cif.su
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        I’ve thought about this at length, and the conclusion I came to is that violence about self-sufficiency, while sex is about cooperation. With violence, you take matters into your own hands and you’re in control regardless of what others feel. With sex, it’s the exact opposite. You’re at their mercy and they have power over you.

        It makes sense in our hostile culture to teach kids about self-sufficiency and taking power for themselves. If they give that power up to others, then it opens them up to manipulation and exploitation.

        I’m not making a judgement call on what’s right or wrong, only what is.

  • Gerudo@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    14 days ago

    You ban something, and people will always find a way around it. Always.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Yup, and that’s how the US got the Mafia. We banned alcohol, but people wanted to drink, so the Mafia made that happen.

      All a ban does is hurt law abiding citizens and businesses.

      • MynameisAllen@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        This is a fairly revisionist history version of the mafia, they were here for decades before prohibition. One might say that they profited greatly from prohibition, but to suggest they began with it is incredibly incorrect. I hate to be the actually guy but I find organized crime fascinating and I can’t let this one go

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Not all bans are bad or hurt law abiding citizens. Slavery and gambling come to mind, both still exist illegally (or, in the case of gambling, semi-legally, what with the deluge of sports betting and online casinos HQd in shitty countries), but I would say them being illegal is a net positive for society.

  • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    14 days ago

    Yeah, it’s just all these children with their bank accounts paying for their VPN subscriptions doing it all… Do they think we’re that stupid? Don’t answer that. 😔

    • Alex@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14 days ago

      It’s the free VPNs that are the problem. They are privacy nightmares.

      • thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 days ago

        If only there was some way the government could have predicted this would happen and maybe not rushed a poorly thought out law in the first place!

        maybe then they would not have:

        • forced big tech companies to withdraw service to the uk
        • forced uk-based small forums and message boards to close
        • given free vpn providers tons more data to sell
        • reduced the overall cyber resilience of the country by forcing people to choose between giving photos of their passports to some weird online service or signing up for a free vpn which sells their data, may inject their own unregulated adverts etc
        • reduced uk based advertising effectiveness and thus investment and marketing spend
        • pissed everyone off while doing it, scoring yet another win for the far right

        absolute roasters the lot of them

          • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            It’s happening due to a big child sexualization/adultization scandal that took forever to blow up[1]. When the deputies came up with a law that was ready and just sitting in a drawer, my mind immediately went “Oh, fuck”. I still gotta read it, because it was approved recently.


            1. While instagram itself has some “moderation”, they’ll happily turn a blind eye to anything that could hurt engagement. 10yo girls doing extremely sexual dances with pornographic music in the background? Boost that shit, look at the engagement!!! Tiktok is equally at fault for the same reason. This shit has been going for years and predates Hytalo and Felca. ↩︎

  • twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Everyone’s scared of Reform getting in and yet Reform are the only ones promising to reverse all this. All this is done based off the back of a 2016 survey where parents said they were worried about kids watching porn on the internet, but the survey gave no indication of what a solution would look like and gave no mention to online age verification and banning VPNs.

  • FUCKING_CUNO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Dame Rachel told BBC Newsnight: “Of course, we need age verification on VPNs - it’s absolutely a loophole that needs closing and that’s one of my major recommendations.”

    If this fucker had any idea what VPN even stood for they’d realize how fuckin stupid this statement is…

  • frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    14 days ago

    Let’s say they do. So people start using non UK VPNs. So you need age verification for any Internet access? For any computer or phone that could connect to the Internet?

    • palordrolap@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      14 days ago

      That’s what they’re aiming for, yes.

      They want to know where everyone is and what every person is doing at every possible moment of every day, be that in public or on the Internet. They are paranoid and know that their entire system is in danger of collapse with the common man gaining control over the rich and powerful.

      Thus they resort to extreme control of the commoners to ensure that won’t happen.

      Child protection and anti-pornography stances are perfect excuses because they’re very difficult to argue against.

      • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        Every time some new measure is released “for protection”, the next day it’s being used to sniff out dissidents. That usually means journalists, activists (political, labor, environment, …) and sympathisants to give them a bit of pressure to straight up arrest them on some pretense.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      14 days ago

      and here we have the heart of the issue, and their end goal. identification required for Internet access. total control.

      • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        14 days ago

        100% and as always they boil it down to “well even if all that other stuff is true, it’s for the safety of children.”

        Yet we have fucking confirmation that exposing networks of wealthy and powerful pedophiles is not on the agenda. Those people are untouchable. Those people are also the ones that we are handing complete control over to.

        So who tf are we really protecting children from by doing this?

    • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      Don’t parental controls exist for a reason? Can’t you just block VPN use on individual devices like an additional parental control rather than making everyone that uses a VPN prove they’re not a child?

  • fluxion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    14 days ago

    Clearly it’s a parental problem to determine if the VPN they are buying for their kids is being used to wank off, but apparently this party of ‘liberty’ has an unhealthy obsession with monitoring our children’s genitalia these days.

    • AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      Unfortunately, neither Labour nor Conservatives are parties of liberty, although there are some individuals within both that see the importance.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    12 days ago

    How about parent your children?

    What about the crappy late night TV channels with the women waving a cordless house phone like it’s 1996?

    I’m perfectly able to watch porn because I’m 45, but I refuse to interact with any of this prove your age bollocks because I know full well that “we won’t store your details” and “we will share your details with 1284 trusted data partners” are the same picture.

      • tarknassus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        And nothing will be done about that until it affects the power brokers in charge*.

        * - hopefully, I mean we’ve had a series of ministers embroiled in scandals that would have caused immediate resignations in the past whereas now it’s “Fuck off, I’m working here. I’M IMPORTANT!”

        • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          The last data breach I can think of that was widely known was Ashley Madison. I think if the Porn ID data got leaked it would have a similar spread (giggity), due to a similar scandalous nature.

  • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    12 days ago

    Children aren’t using VPNs. Also I am going to say this: it doesn’t matter that fucking much. I watched porn before I was 18. It didn’t really do much to me. It did not give me unrealistic expectations of women. What did affect me were entirely unrelated stuff. Which is why I do need therapy and sexual therapy, but it wasnt the porn. It was people like that fucker.

  • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    FYI, with Mullvad VPN set to UK, sites that require age verification:

    Sites tha do NOT require age verification:

    And xvideos.com is a bit special since it shows you the thumbnails of porn videos but won’t let you play them.

    But we need to stop VPNs! Think of the whole two children that have VPNs! What if instead of just going to the half of the sites that don’t verify age, they figure out how to use a VPN?! Oh the humanity!

    Yeah, UK wants to de-anonymize VPN users as the next step in their attack on free speech. It is laughable to think this is about anything else.