• Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I don’t count this as fake. He most certainly uses the software and the features he described are actually features under plex pass. And I no doubt believe he enjoys it. No lies here. My experience with plex pass is the same lol.

    • Syltti@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I think the point being made is that company staff shouldn’t be leaving five-star reviews on products they, themselves, work on. Whether they do it because they love the product, or a company suit told them to. Personally, I think it’s fine to try and convince people to use your/your company’s software, but giving yourself a five-star review to do so is downright pathetic.

      • Pika@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’m fully okay with them doing so, but they have to disclose what they’re doing so. Like the fact that the review didn’t disclose that they were an employee is very sketchy to me.

    • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They seriously enshitified the download feature. You used to be able to set it to download X number of unplayed episodes. Then it would manage downloading fresh content for you as you watched stuff. Now you have to manually download each and every episode yourself. This was literally the killer feature Plex had over Jellyfin for me.

      • LavaPlanet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I think they’re getting pressure re the pirating aspect. I could imagine the bigger they get the bigger the magnifying glass will be held up to them. They’re probably doing some fancy footwork to be able to remain in production / avoid lawsuits and similar pressure.

        • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Sure, that’s why they keep adding features people don’t want. But gimping one of their key paid features makes no sense to me.

          • Robust Mirror@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            I would imagine its harder to argue you don’t condone your users using it for piracy when you have a feature that automatically does stuff very closely related to piracy. I’m not going to get into an argument over whether it’s defensible legally or not, but it makes sense to me that they play it safe in general.

    • Sips'@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yeah fair enough, and I do agree. I only reused the title of the forum post where this was originally posted. Have changed the title up now.

        • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 hours ago

          If he was forthcoming in his review, it would have been to obvious that it’s a breach of the ToS. Workers are not permitted to review apps made by their own company.

          This is 100% a shady review.