Some key insights from the article:

Basically, what they did was to look at how much batteries would be needed in a given area to provide constant power supply at least 97% of the time, and the calculate the costs of that solar+battery setup compared to coal and nuclear.

  • frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Yeah, they do, and they pretend to be wise adults while doing it. Like they’re the only ones who thought of this.

    EVs, too. No, we don’t have to wait until they can all do 1000 miles and charge in 5 minutes. 350 miles and 20 minute 10-80% charge is fine for the vast majority of the market.

    • NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Urgh, the ones that say “well my ice car can do 700 miles on a tank so until EV can do that I’m not doing it” annoy the hell out of me.

      I know damn well they’re never driven that far without stopping at least once