• InFerNo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      The argument has always been, if when chat rooms are public, anyone can join and start logging the chats, encryption does nothing.

      It has the ability to connect over TLS, but that’s about it.

      I loved using it for its simplicity, except when using all the different flavours of nick registration (Q, NickServ, …).

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        My friends created a telegram group and invited in a couple of bots that do stupid things like posting images or vulgarities when they detect certain words, or perform actions on request.

        I tried to convince them to get rid of the bots but they’re in the “we have nothing to hide” camp.

      • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        There is some nuance here. It would be nice to not have your identity publicly linked to your IP address, which is not always the default on IRC.

        That’s the main privacy concern I know about I guess.

    • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      xmpp isn’t.

      (Ok I get xmpp alone is but every modern client supports the same two encryption methods so judge for yourself)