• dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I explicitly told it eleven times in ALL CAPS not to do this. I am a little worried about safety now.

    This baffles me. How can anyone see AI function in the wild and not conclude 1) it has no conscience, 2) it’s free to do whatever it’s empowered to do if it wants and 3) at some level its behavior is pseudorandom and/or probabilistic? We’re figuratively rolling dice with this stuff.

    • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It’s incredible that it works, it’s incredible what just encoding language can do, but it is not a rational thinking system.

      I don’t think most people care about the proverbial man behind the curtain, it talks like a human so it must be smart like a human.

        • fishy@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Smart is a relative term lol.

          A stupid human is still smart when compared to a jellyfish. That said, anybody who comes away from interactions with LLM’s and thinks they’re smart is only slightly more intelligent than a jellyfish.

        • sunbytes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Yes, and they were all as smart at humans. ;)

          So mostly average but some absolute thickos too.