• Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    There they say that it’s not yet ready to be used in evidence, but the problem with that is that most forensic “science” is generally misapplied and nowhere near as conclusive as the police want us to think.

    This is such an important thing to remember. It’s just like how a lot of hand-held breathalyzers are closed source, and when their source code is finally subjected to scrutiny (because you’re supposed to be able to face your accuser, and the device is your accuser), it often doesn’t meet basic required standards for things like error reporting or failsafes to prevent false positives.

    Much of forensic “science” isn’t exactly science as we understand it.