Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-218 days agoAmy Klobuchar learned that a video clip of her was going viral on social media. So she clicked on it. She saw her face and her voice saying vulgar things she had never said. It was an AI deepfake. www.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up110arrow-down11
arrow-up19arrow-down1external-linkAmy Klobuchar learned that a video clip of her was going viral on social media. So she clicked on it. She saw her face and her voice saying vulgar things she had never said. It was an AI deepfake. www.nytimes.comDavriellelouna@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-218 days agomessage-square14fedilink
minus-squareartyom@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·18 days agoHard to imagine how they’re going to take down deepfakes without limiting freedom of information or how they will prove who made the content.
minus-squareCmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·18 days agoWell they already have a leg up with the TAKE IT DOWN Act that Democrats worked with Ted Cruz and Trump to get passed.
minus-squareartyom@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·18 days agoTo my knowledge, that only covers pornographic content.
minus-squareCmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·18 days agoAnd the Patriot Act was only implemented to catch terrorists. What’s considered “pornographic content” is entirely subjective and up to the personal feelings of a particular judge.
Hard to imagine how they’re going to take down deepfakes without limiting freedom of information or how they will prove who made the content.
Block chain!
i kid, but it could
Well they already have a leg up with the TAKE IT DOWN Act that Democrats worked with Ted Cruz and Trump to get passed.
To my knowledge, that only covers pornographic content.
And the Patriot Act was only implemented to catch terrorists. What’s considered “pornographic content” is entirely subjective and up to the personal feelings of a particular judge.