Somehow, AI is going to be responsible for both dystopia and utopia. But the good news is we have 18 months to get ready!

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    Artificial intelligence was not developed to usher in a dystopia, in fact it had a rather utopic mission. By further automating mundane tasks, AI has the potential to ease the workload of millions of workers worldwide in every job and field, potentially giving them back their precious time of the day without sacrificing overall productivity.

    Yeah, good luck with that.

    In reality, everyone gets fired, the rich get richertge poor get poorer and 99.9% of humans will live in a dystopia, if AI doesn’t kill us all.

    Yet the AI bros go like “that won’t happen to ME though!”

    • HakunaHafada@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      If we had a proper social safety net for all the displaced people, I’d be more open to it. But as things are now with rampant greed and a government for the corporations, fuck AI.

      • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        I can’t shake the feeling that all this talk of UBI and other social safety nets that are meant to support the majority of the populace after some notional post-work future society ignore a really big elephant in the room:

        If most people are solely reliant on the good grace of a single entity, the government, for their whole means of survival, their entire existence is at the pleasure of that government. The populace becomes completely beholden to them, not the other way around.

        The whole idea feels suspiciously like a trap set by bad actors with a long-term plan to steal the government from the governed.

        • HakunaHafada@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          I could see your argument if UBI was a recent concept (made by bad actors aimed at fixing today’s problem in order to steal the government from the governed tomorrow), but the concept has been around for a while: wiki article.

          • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            Its not so much of an argument as a concern. It puts an extreme amount of the country’s economic activity directly in the hands of the government. We see globally that governments can quickly change their motivations.

            The same rope that can be used to help people out of a hole can be used to tie them up.

    • Balder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      If you think about it, the majority of the world population never knew anything different than dystopia.

      In a sense, the article is tailored to a certain public that has a reasonably good life now and is naturally afraid to lose it.

      But the truth is the world is (and always has been) very shitty for the majority of people on the planet when you consider the distribution of wealth.

      I think it’s important to think about who are the winners and losers in this whole thing. Are these execs so altruist that they’re worried about the average person or is this doom prediction something that serves their agenda?