AmidFuror

It’s because the understatement came from the paper and the bullshit came from the science reporter.

“Has the potential to contribute…” Wow. Amazing.

Fewer workers are required when their productivity is enhanced.

The paper was linked when this was posted 3 days ago.

Did AI write the headline? Article abstract is about detecting how much AI is in use by looking for an uptick in AI-favored words. Headline is about how scientists found out that AI prefers certain words.

If it were actually about the headline topic, the paper would be fatally flawed.

I am in the “whistling into the phone handset on a dialup connection is the purest form of online communication” club.

Can it take back headlines that imply the text regrets itself? It’s a “regretted” text. The text isn’t full of regret.

Had this for old portable CD players (the kind that would skip when the car hit a bump). They don’t work all that well. Even if you find a frequency not in use, it gets interrupted from time to time as you’re driving around.

The hypocrisy is massive. Not surprising, but massive.

Apple and Samsung should be spreading rumors.

I’ll stick to IRL strippers, thank you very much.

Largest living bird species wingspan is 3.6m.

In contrast to Chinese citizens who are famously free to travel about anonymously and voice any opinion they like about their government.

I think your comment is misunderstood.

The 3000 cars a day were just for a few days before the government credits were set to expire.

Great, now my hands can get hacked.

No, I didn’t imagine that.

Did you read the direct thread to my comment?

Roe v Wade determined that the right to privacy was in the Constitution (due process clause of 4th Amendment) and that Texas laws restricting it were unconstitutional.

States restricting abortion was the unconstitutional thing which was suddenly Constitutional again after Dobbs.

Banning abortion?

That’s a bingo! Is that how you say it?

I had poop drones on my bingo card!

Have vaginal scented candles been invented?