More salient takeaway is, don’t use a LLM to translate a scientific paper. Because it can’t translate a scientific paper. It can only rewrite the entire paper, in a different language. And it will introduce misunderstandings and hallucinations.

LEG DAY EVERY DAY

It probably includes the nearly microscopic droplets that spray out of the urinal.

For some reason

$$$

Literally EVERY SINGLE TIME a news article mentions both “porn” and “children”, it turns out it’s some bullshit being pushed by a Christian fundamentalist group, and often with an added dose of state surveillance and restricting liberty. Add in “terrorists”? Don’t even bother with this article, it’s pure hysteria propaganda. It’s like a WASPy suburban mom’s wet dream.

wasting more money on more contractors and giving them more of our data to store

…is the point.

Doesn’t change the fact that FUCK THAT

And we have absolutely no data to suggest that’s happening. It’s purely hypothetical.

They’re being so caustic because they get a sick power rush from trying unleash a mob on someone. That’s all. They probably don’t give a shit about children.

Ok, but by that definition Google should be banned because their trawler isn’t guaranteed to not pick up CP.

In my opinion, if the technology involves casting a huge net, and then creating an abstracted product from what is caught in the net, with no steps in between seen by a human, then is it really causing any sort of actual harm?

Way to not answer the question.

It would probably make me distrust the prosecution, like if they’re bringing this up they must not have much to go on. Like every time a black man is shot by police they bring up that he smoked weed.

I guess my main complaint is that it’s insane to view it as equivalent to real CP, and it’s harmful to waste any resources prosecuting it.

This sounds like you’re searching really hard for a reason to justify banning it. Pretty tenuous “what if” there.

Like, a dildo could hypothetically be used to sexualize a child. Should we ban dildos?

It’s so vague it could apply to anything.

No one is out here making stupid-ass claims around child marriage.

Why are YOU so passionate about AI porn? Why do you people make this an issue at all when there are real actual kids out there being harmed?

Removed by mod

With a set of all images on the internet. Why do you people always think this is a “gotcha”?

I’m offended by stupid-ass shit and feel compelled to call it out. Thinking AI-generated fake images is just as harmful as actual children getting abused is perhaps the most obvious definition of “stupid-ass shit” since the invention of stupid-ass shit.

If a child is not being harmed, I truly do not give a shit.

such material can easily be used to groom children

This literally makes no sense.

Correct. And even then, there’s vanishingly little CP on lemmy.