I’m ootl, what happened to Nova? I have it on my old phone.
The quote so nice you commented twice!
You’re basically just proving my point. The first half is “irrelevant”, as you said, or “unrelated”, as I said. You’re filling in gaps from the first half to the second half.
The post goes (paraphrased): It seems like an oversight to not have this feature of having individuals in multiple households. It got me thinking. Companies can choose not to hire you if your parents weren’t married.
You’ve filled in the “it got me thinking” with “…they encountered this issue with a minor thing, started reading up on it online, and when digging into that kind of stuff ended up reading on what the legal situation is…”
That’s exactly what I said is the mental gymnastics in response to OP’s question, and you’re filing it in like they actually explained it.
Yeah, it feels like a big leap to go from the first part to the second. Like, how are they related? Hence, mental gymnastics.
But how many are going to want this feature? I’m betting the number of people who use the one household feature is already relatively small. And, that barely works properly as it is.
I’m not the one you asked, but: They’re not discriminating, they have a feature that allows a group, maybe a household, to be managed together and share features. Going from “they don’t support this niche feature” to “they’re discriminating against me” is the mental gymnastics.
Yeah this looks to me like everyone got scammed, including the new owners.
I’m pretty sure Shakespeare used it as slang for penis in the 16th century.
Edit: err yeah, says it in the linked Wikipedia article, oops
Yes, but I’m saying the algorithm for layoffs factors in “performance”, which can be factored from past bonus allocations.
The algorithm isn’t going to lay off 150’s, but might preferentially select 100’s.
I don’t have inside info, I’m just making assumptions that the data has to come from somewhere.
Sort of. Managers still get in a room and decide how the bonus pool should be distributed by ranking people.
Having a more aggressive manager is important for getting a better bonus.
I could see this factoring into layoff decisions.
Does this mean the other products they ship aren’t hit with tariffs? Are they somehow wholly made in the US vs the ones that were dropped?
Edit: found my own answer:
“We priced our laptops when tariffs on imports from Taiwan were 0%. At a 10% tariff, we would have to sell the lowest-end SKUs at a loss.”
I was going to say this is good for Canada, but part of the draw to bring engineers here is the path to the H1B. If there is no H1B end-game, maybe they won’t bring them to Canada either.
That said, we have some sizeable offices already established here, so maybe there is still incentive.
Fuck this article for never saying what AOSP stands for.
(Android Open Source Project according to my search)
TLDR: 3.11 is twice as fast as 3.10 at doing global name lookups, so an old speedup hack of aliasing a global function locally isn’t needed.
For example, when calling len() in a loop, going l=len, and calling l() in the loop was faster in 3.10. In 3.11, moreso in 3.13, it’s almost a wash.
However, the author says this:
But when I look at the numbers, I would say 3.13 is pretty close to making it an unnecessary optimization in general. A little subjective on how you interpret the numbers.
Great info, but this was like trying to use a recipe and reading the author’s life story to get there.