

There is definitely reason a larger model would have worse hallucinations. Why do you say not? It’s a fundamental problem with data scaling in these architectures
There is definitely reason a larger model would have worse hallucinations. Why do you say not? It’s a fundamental problem with data scaling in these architectures
Maybe I misunderstood, are you saying all hallucinations originate from the safety regression period? Because hallucinations appear in all architectures of current research, open models, even with clean curated data included. Fact checking itself works somewhat, but the confidence levels are off sometimes and if you crack that problem, please elaborate because it would make you rich
Open source is always one step ahead. But they don’t have the resources and brand hype so people assume oai is cutting edge still
I don’t quite understand why o3 for coding? Do you mean for code architecture or something? Like creating apps? Why not use a better model if its for coding?
Because it’s not guessing, it’s fully presenting it as fact, and for other good reasons it’s actually a very good term for the issue inherent to all regression networks
They search for the wow moment to continue striking while the iron is hot, but are stuck. Failing to realise that it’s when companies search for filler features and do shit like “it can talk like a human now and you can customise it” and pander it as a step forward that consumers instinctively distrust the company. If there is no new progress due to data incompleteness or incompetence or whatever, they should be ware to not further monotenize this scientific breakthrough and forever ruin the new programming language that we have discovered.
You fundamentally don’t understand the hallucination problem and when it arises
Well, there is also the group that thinks they are “based” “fire” and so on, like always, fanatics ruin everything. They aren’t God, nor a plague. Find another interest if this bores you
What are you talking about? What significance does that have with anything we are discussing?
I have. Several times answered. Your childish method of debating is worrysome. I was hoping for some explanation to why you are hostile but it seems clear this is never going to be fun or informative. Read again if you really want the information you pretend to look for
I use rokid air max and it is wonderful, but fatigue sets in despite the light weight due to the heat. Hope they make them with a heat vent
Yes you are. I don’t as I said understand what the fuck made you leap to that I personally should explain to you some specific event I will not. Mostly because of your manners. Better luck next time
We are on the topic of market manipulation. Hedge fund sociopaths have this as their job. They generate value by managing the richest families’ fortune and use the leverage to find loopholes and scemes to compete with each other. Most happens at the microsecond level between robots hosted on prime real estate meters from the transactions made at Dow to reduce the already vanishingly miniscule delay that cable and switch hops can add to the rapid fire buy and sell patterns used to defuse or lure the other bots. Into these spinning wheels they parcel all actual buy and sells from the retail investors app and use as ammunition. The strategy for the Frat boys is not at this quantum level. They organize schemes. Different types of scams to trick money from anyone stupid enough to fall for it. Afterwards, when they are fined (several daily) for every transgressions, and it’s a lot cheaper than what they made. By orders of magnitude. So they are never accountable and can be open about their operations. If this was one such we will soon see who made what, since after a set amount of days they have to disclose their positions. Then they congratulate each other on who made most. Hope it helps.
Also, I might add that your hostile manner is honestly funny to observe but remember that it shortens your lifespan. It won’t mean much at your age but at some point, you will probably come to enjoy life and rue your angry years that turned your liver into a nesting doll and mind into a perforated pachinko course of irritability
They are. How does that make me know what they did if they did anything?
How do you reckon that? Not a little antoganistic haha. Good luck in life like that
They do various schemes to manipulate and extract money from the free markets.
It’s not a conspiracy, they are quite open even with their methods, because they are… Bragging… About it.
No system can be proven to have no exploits, but a backdoor is when there is a hidden prepared exploit planted on the inside (in this case presumably because they were funded by the government they assume they would get this in return, even though if that was the case they would do a crypto transaction and not openly fund them)
Yeah the government has an institutional thing I forget what it is called, with massive amount of known exploits. That’s not backdoors. A backdoor is a “planted” exploit, not a discovered exploit. It makes no sense to call all exploits backdoors.
Why? I am trying to understand what you mean so I can change my opinion. I’m not changing it because you are fuming and escalating the aggression, in fact, that has the exact opposite effect
About things the other person has searched for and visited and when their networks touch it spreads. It’s easy to do without a mic