

LNG requires massive billion-dollar facilities to purify and condense for transport, there isn’t “spare capacity” just lying around
I sail the high seas of the Lemmyverse, posting snarky + Lefty comments
LNG requires massive billion-dollar facilities to purify and condense for transport, there isn’t “spare capacity” just lying around
This was mentioned in the write-up, the password manager didn’t autofill, but he was too out of it to notice at first
Good evening Dessalines, I have started looking at the posts query.
The lowest hanging fruit I think would be if we could replace some of the joins with WHERE EXISTS
which can have a huge impact on the query time. It seems this is supported in Diesel: https://stackoverflow.com/a/74300447
This is my first time looking at the codebase so I can’t tell yet which joins are purely for filtering (in which case they can be replaced by WHERE EXISTS
) and which joins need to be left in because some of their columns end up in the final SELECT
I can’t tell for sure yet but it also looks like this might also be using LIMIT...OFFSET
pagination? That can be a real drag on performance but isn’t as easy to fix.
EDIT:
Looking some more, and reading some linked github discussion - I think to really get this out of the performance pits will require some denormalization like a materialized view or manual cache tables populated by triggers. I really like the ranking algorithm but so far I’m finding it difficult to optimize from a query perspective
I should have some time tonight to start looking at this. Thanks for the info!
Does the project maintain a list of known slow queries? This is my favorite type of work
My speculations:
“insecure from the start” - as in , the wallet was never that “cold”
with that amount of money, it’s easy to imagine an “insider threat”
the hackers could have gotten lucky and struck right when the company was doing legitimate operations on the wallet
but probably it’s a towering mountain of incompetence, composed of the elements above and more
Hard to say right now. The article suggests that the banks are just trying to free up cash on their balance sheets. However, this could instead be an indication that they are looking for a “bigger fool” to take the losses. I personally think the bottom won’t fall out of Xitter until the tesla share price crashes. Elon bought some time with credulous fools with the ridiculous cybercab demo, but that can’t last forever. At that point I think the only question is whether SpaceX gets pulled down with all the rest of the musk ventures
Truly one of the greatest cover images of all time