

You should pretty much assume everything that a chatbot says could be false to a much higher degree than human written content, making it effectively useless for your stated purpose.
You should pretty much assume everything that a chatbot says could be false to a much higher degree than human written content, making it effectively useless for your stated purpose.
You’re damn right, if somebody puts slop in my face I get visibly aggressive.
Easier and much lower quality, limited capability, and very high risk of plagiarism. AI is shit, mate.
Not really, too many lives at stake.
This is probably Trump trying to get Musk to shut up about Epstein.
Meh, maybe Shonen Jump or other big names might enshitify, but I dont see this technology competing with human artists for limited spots.
Welp, looks like the anime industry is dead.
Long live Manga, supreme ruler since ages before our time.
It’s less of an unknown and more of a “it has never demonstrated any such capability.”
Btw both OpenAI and Deepmind wrote papers proving their then models would never approach human error rate with infinite training. It correctly predicted performance of ChatGPT4.
Elon Musk literally owns a medical equipment company that puts chips in peoples brains, nothing is sacred unless we protect it.
I actually don’t think that’s the problem, the problem is that the AI only factors for visible surface level information.
AI don’t have object permanence, once something is out of sight it does not exist.
Theres no evidence they will ever reach quality output with infinite data, either. In that case, quality matters.
Imagine if the Tesla autopilot without lidar that crashed into things and drove on the sidewalk was actually a scalpel navigating your spleen.
See the part that I dont like is that this is a learning algorithm trained on videos of surgeries.
That’s such a fucking stupid idea. Thats literally so much worse than letting surgeons use robot arms to do surgeries as your primary source of data and making fine tuned adjustments based on visual data in addition to other electromagnetic readings
Michael Dunne is actually someone who worked in Chinese Automotive manufacturing. He’s the Chinese car manufacturer saying “Chinese cars are good and cheap.”
His word is basically meaningless.
Former big corporation*
Who also worked primarily in Chinese Automotive industry*
Michael Dunne has been competing the entire time, for the Chinese. His statements here aren’t fear, they’re shillery.
Free markets were always a terrible idea, the USA economic system was basically founded on principles of regulation of goods like tea, tobacco, and alcohol.
Uh, to be clear, I don’t think Michael Dunne is advocating against China in this context. He worked in the Chinese auto sector for decades. He isn’t an alarmist, he’s their salesman.
Lmao, Chinese shills are actual news now? Fucking low as it gets.
I gave advice, advice rarely follows what you’ve experienced or people wouldn’t feel the need to give it.