Don’t get me wrong, I don’t support this. But I can see how the suits at Synology could come to the conclusion that this is a great idea

People who buy overpriced “solutions” instead of taking the time to configure a PC seem like exactly the crowd to enjoy a closed ecosystem (see apple)

Why bother? Use a VPN.

Do the cars not have to be certified? It seems to me that fewer employees just means longer delays for certifications, not easier certifications

Based and penguin pilled

You can use FDE and setup a minimal ssh server like dropbear to run at startup. This way, you can supply the password via a keyboard connected to the machine OR via ssh. This gives you a similar workflow to the data partition you mentioned, but encrypts the entire system.

Which country is that? I just recently got fiber, but 1G down 0.5G up would cost me 90€/month, and that’s the fastest they’re offering.

I also wouldn’t use the built-in Wifi on this, but I can understand why they’d want to offer an all-in-one solution

I hate the cloudflare stuff making me do captchas or outright denying me with a burning passion. My fault for committing the heinous crime of using a VPN!

From the image, it doesn’t seem like it has rack mounts, which is kind of an odd choice. There are lots of switches that have a similar form factor, but can be put in 10" or 19" racks depending on which rack ears you put on it

Follow-up video idea: speed ≠ distance

Git is already decentralized, nothing is stopping you from adding multiple remotes to your repo.

I’d rather have my tax euros pay them than pay microsoft. Granted, that money being used to employ devs to create a FOSS solution would be even better, but commercial Linux would already be a great first step in the right direction.

I always thought the second amendment was supposed to prevent this

What’s stopping you from connecting it to the local network but denying internet access? E.g. via a firewall rule or separate VLAN?