

Access Denied Our apologies, the content you requested cannot be accessed.
Great article!
Luckily there’s an archived version:
One more step Please complete the security check to access archive.is
recaptcha…
LXMF: lxmf@4804baaf06a5fc8a2e6a143154c10336
Access Denied Our apologies, the content you requested cannot be accessed.
Great article!
Luckily there’s an archived version:
One more step Please complete the security check to access archive.is
recaptcha…
it never is. fines should be a percentage of the value of the company, not just some sum.
And ethical hacking and law-abiding hacking aren’t the same either
I prefer saying ‘grey hat’ instead of ‘ethical hacker’ because ethical hacker is now used to mean ‘pentester’, ‘red teamer’ and all the other cybersecurity stuff, or so it seems to me.
that was the entire meaning of my comment, I clearly didn’t make it clear enough.
I’m pretty sure that’s what’s meant by ‘ethical hacker’ in most cases and that’s why I wanted to point out the difference you are pointing out right now.
I do not want any hacking device to be illegal, as they can be used for good(overthrowing the state and capitalism).
not doing something by fear of the law is not ethical. that said, some of them are ethical, but ethical hacker would mostly include grey hats, which they wouldn’t want because they can’t say illegal hackers use their device.
“ethical hacker’s swiss army knife” I hate it when they always add “ethical”. First of all, when you say ethical you mean law-fearing, they don’t really care about ethics and, secondly, “regular” hackers use it too, so it’s just a hacker’s swiss army knife…
I use uMatrix, which blocks js by default, so it is a bit inconvenient to have to enable js for some sites. websites which didn’t need it before, which is often the reason I use them, now require javascript.
that’s what lemmy does, with a slight bias towards communism…