• DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    Insurance companies…sorry you’re denied for being a health risk…we can see from your home internet that you’re an unhealthy person

  • paraphrand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Damn. “TikTok would like to access WiFi”

    We need new permissions for this shit. WiFi can do presence detection and now heart rate? What next? Eye tracking?

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This tech scares the hell out of me.

    Great if we can make MRI quality imaging eventually available, but being able to monitor where people are in their homes remotely and their health status in our world is fucking dangerous.

  • inconel@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Capitalism asks whether you are the kind of person harvesting people’s health info without concent or selling aluminum mesh underwear with fearmongering campaign. No other choices.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    And I guarantee some organization will figure out how to use this for some police state bullshit.

    • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s already the original use case. Cardiac signature biometrics, can install in a doorway and do identity verification and track/monitor every individual that passes through the threshold

  • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    2026: Major grocers found using customer heart rate to personalise prices - higher the pulse, higher the price

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          90 is damn near perfect for most adults. It’s a little high for children, but even for most teens that would be right in the middle of “the green zone.” My resting heart rate of 60 is way too low especially combined with my regular blood pressure of 100/50

          • AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Hm I’m not sure I’d say it’s perfect? I thought 70-80 was?

            My cardiologist said it isn’t really “danger zone”, but if it were like 100+ it might be concerning.

            I have had all the scans done, including a close look at my hearteries, and everything came back (surprisingly) clean.

  • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Cool tech but I question it’s usefulness. They focus on clinical in their language but anybody who’s on telemetry orders needs waveforms not beats per minute. I care if they’re suddenly in afib, not that they’re a little tachy after getting up to go to the bathroom.