• Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The answer is in the first few words of the article, “Finland’s track gauge is the same as Russia’s was in the late 19th and early 20th century— 1,524mm — which is 89mm wider than the European standard.”

    So again, why is it that you oppose this change?

    • idegenszavak@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Actually Russian gauge is not 1524mm, but 1520mm! Finland has unique gauge not used anywhere else in the World, although that 4mm difference allows most bogies to be compatible with both of them, international trains can run through the border without bogie exchange.

      So the point of the article is right, butnot perfect in details. I love trains.

      • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        However, as the text says “early 20th century”, 1524 mm was the nominal gauge of soviet/russian railways until the 1970s.

    • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      There was no question in my comment. The answer to your question is in my comment. It really isn’t that hard to understand.

      Finland doesn’t have much of a rail network, and the only international connection over land used to be to St Petersburg. If Estonia & Sweden & the big ferry companies are on board it would be nice to change gauge evtl., to have freight waggons come across the ferries.

      But I don’t like that our practically failed government uses this to raise its prestige while every statistic shows that their stupid austerity measures a) save way too little money and b) fuck up the country and its people.

      So when our far-right anti-social government says “now is the right time for Finland to start work on changing the gauge” I disagree.

      • Melchior@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        There is also a rail connection with Sweden, which use standard gauge.

        Anyway the work would start 2030 at the earliest. So this is an announcment of creating plans to do it, which is cheap.

    • huppakee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I too agree this might not be worth the investment, although I don’t know how many connections there are with Sweden, Norway and the rest of EU by ferry.

        • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Oh and look what the same transport minister said just over a year ago:

          On 8 February 2024, Finnish Minister of Transport and Communications Lulu Ranne told Estonian daily Postimees that the tunnel is “unrealistic” and not on the agenda of the government, with the project remaining on hold unless further funding is provided by the European Union.

          That was before their ratings went down.

      • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        None! Partly because of geography, partly, I guess, precisely because of this difference. Would be nice to see more freight trains instead of trucks coming from the ferries but again, this government has systematically fucked over the little people to save a few hundred million euros, I’d like them to fix that first thankyouverymuch.