The Ukrainian parliament on July 22 approved amendments that effectively destroy the independence of Ukraine’s two key anti-corruption institutions, according to opposition lawmakers and watchdogs.

The legislation grants the prosecutor general new powers over investigations led by the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and cases led by the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAPO).

The step comes as Ukrainian authorities ramp up pressure against the two agencies established as part of the anti-graft reforms after the EuroMaidan Revolution.

  • Hubi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ukraine is still a democracy. There are varying degrees of freedom and stability obviously but the underlying system is there.

    • RedPandaRaider@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      The revolution didn’t magically wipe out oligarchs and corruption. Ukraine is still an oligarchy, not a democracy. Do we not remember that before Zelenskyy, there was Poroshenko, a literal oligarch?

      We shouldn’t whitewash history as it’s happening, just because someone is on the right side.

      • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m fine with this logic, but it also has to extend logically to the United States no longer being a democracy, and it’s arguable that a number of EU states would also qualify.

        • RedPandaRaider@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I can’t argue against that.

          I’ve never considered the US a democracy. It’s a one party state with the American exceptionalism of needing to have two parties to one up the other one party states.

          • Nasan@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            16 hours ago

            By their logic, not even the EU and the Western world could be considered democratic because oligarchs and corruption exist.

            • RedPandaRaider@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              That is true.

              No true full democracy exists.

              The two states closest to one in my opinion though are Switzerland and Cuba. Both with their own limitations preventing them from being considered a full democracy.

              Switzerland essentially outsourced it’s entire working class to immigrants who cannot vote. Therefore it’s just a democracy of the wealthy. Meanwhile Cuba needs to maintain revolutionary mass organisations to prevent counter-revolutionaries from hijacking their democracy.

        • Saleh@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          24 hours ago

          The US has been an oligarchy for a long time. It was only briefly interrupted by short periods of democracy.

          Heck, many EU states are still monarchies, with a representative system slapped on top. As long as there is something like a “royal family” whose privileged status is inherited, the country shouldn’t be considered a democracy. Equality in the face of the law is a core principal of democracy and any formal royal family is a clear violation of that.