• Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      20 days ago

      Ok…what’s meshtastic? I still haven’t clicked the article, and know nothing of which you speak.

      I’d say this title is for people like me. I think it sounds cool.

      • pezhore@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        20 days ago

        It is cool! The barrier to entry is relatively low. The only thing to really worry about is:

        1. What band/frequency is appropriate for you country.
        2. Are there others around to which you can connect?

        If there’s not a lot of people around it’s not the end of the world. Nodes can connect over the Internet via MQTT servers. Yes, this defeats the purpose of having an offline/decentralized communication platform, but it is a good stop gap until more nodes are put up.

        Here’s a sample of what I can see in a somewhat large-ish Midwest City in the US (there’s about 63 nodes I can reach by hopping through relays).

        • themadcodger@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 days ago

          I got mine recently in a dxent aized city and while there are plenty of nodes popping up on the map, the local channel is pretty quiet. Is that normal?

          • pezhore@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            20 days ago

            Yep, that can be normal. For my city, the local group has a private (but free to join) channel that’s a bit more active.

            Do a web search for meshtastic and your city and see if one pops up.

      • brunoqc@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        It allows us to make a mesh network (interconnected nodes where you can contact a node even if it’s not in range for you, by using other nodes) with Lora radio devices. Lora is slow but has long range. I think it works better when you have line of sight, like if someone can put a node on a mountain, it would help everyone.

        I think people might have sent audio with it but it’s mostly useful for text messages. It could be useful if the Internet is down, maybe, but it’s more like a toy.

    • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 days ago

      Definitely clickbait. The phrase “send texts” as it’s been used for the past quarter century means “sms texts” or maybe “text messages to other people on mobile phone networks”, which is not at all what this is.

      • altphoto@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        Yeah this is not SMS! Its probably text that looks like:
        ¥¢¥=¶√•€¢√°=¶}{°÷™π™¥π¥¥° °{}}∆∆×÷°%¢¢°{]]×=%π¥®√™

  • TryingSomethingNew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    20 days ago

    Nice article on Meshtastic. The problem is that, like anything, the actual distance is a lot more dependent on line of sight and the actual mesh existing. Which means we’d need a LOT more people to adopt these and put up repeaters for them to be useful. Which is doable, but not cheap.

    • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      Have a look at meshmap.net. That shows people who have voluntarily put themselves on a map.

      Although it can be a serious underestimation, for example in my area, I’m the only one who lists myself on the map, but there are about 10 other nodes that don’t

      Edit: Also, the number of nodes on MeshMap has pretty much doubled in six months since I started playing with it.

    • IllNess@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 days ago

      I always thought these were more like walkie talkies for messaging than telephones that you can call anyone.

      Like it would be good if cell serivce goes down.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        20 days ago

        That’s pretty much exactly what they are. Text message in walkie-talkies. With the added benefit that if your friend can’t hear you, but another friend is in between, your message automatically gets relayed through their walkie-talkie.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        You can’t expect me not to reinvent the wheel.

        As we post on Lemmy, which is a reinvention of a reinvention of a reinvention of Usenet from 1979.

    • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      Companies are starting to manufacture repeaters and they are not that expensive. You can get one for about 100 Federal Reserve Notes.

      • Thwompthwomp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        Sucks you can’t charge it and have to instead go to a central bank to exchange minted coins for notes that you can exchange for the commodity that is the radio.

    • Eheran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      20 days ago

      At that point, given the extremely small bandwidth, we might as well just use a massive wifi, everyone already has the required hardware for that instead of producing more trash for a pretty much non-existing use case.

      • deafboy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        Ever since I switched to lemmy, I constantly stumble upon people trying to guilt other people for their hobbies. That’s pretty unhealthy.

        Whoever reads this, don’t feel guilty living your life. Spend time on whatever you’re passionate about. Build new things, even if they do not have a rational use case at the moment. They might play an important role in your future.

        • MangoCats@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 days ago

          WiFi goes down and people sometimes NEED to communicate instead of streaming Netflix.

          This is just an alternate channel, if Eheran doesn’t have the imagination to understand how low bandwidth can still be extremely valuable, as compared to, say, screaming at the top of your lungs to attempt to be heard 5 miles away, then… I’m not really interested in what they think.

      • ilovepiracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 days ago

        In trying times you’re missing the big picture. If they were more commonplace, you’d have a decentralised communication network that can’t be shut down by the government.

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 days ago

          Funny thing about Wi-Fi, it overlaps with an Amateur radio band (the 2.4GHz spec does) and so hams are allowed to run Wi-Fi with no encryption but a tremendous amount of power and high gain antennas on like the highest channels.

          • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 days ago

            A portion of the 5GHz WiFI band overlaps with the 5.8GHz ham band too. There are also a few WiFi radios that will also work above the US WiFi band where they can operate without interference from other license free devices. Those are used in the HamWAN network.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        You can have one or the other. If you choose high bandwidth, you’re going to get very short distance because you can’t do serious error correction, etc. If you choose long range, you’re going to get low bandwidth because you need to include error correction, etc. In the transmissions.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        Some people already are

        https://map.nycmesh.net/

        But the point of LoRa is in the name, long range. Wifi barely reaches outside my house. Also a WiFi mesh is dependent on a variety of complicated and proprietary networks and systems while meshtastic is entirely independent.

            • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              19 days ago

              Yes. LoRa (from “long range”, sometimes abbreviated as “LR”) is a physical proprietary radio communication technique.[2] It is based on spread spectrum modulation techniques derived from chirp spread spectrum (CSS) technology.[3] It was developed by Cycleo, a company of Grenoble, France, and patented in 2014.

    • themadcodger@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 days ago

      I got mine recently in a dxent aized city and while there are plenty of nodes popping up on the map, the local channel is pretty quiet. Is that normal?

      • mesa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        Yeah, we had to make a weather app on longfast to fill the void. Tech people tend to not talk all that much. We are the strange ones ;)

        Most of the weather app was made from a reddit post back a year or so ago. I have no idea where though. App is a python script here if your interested.

    • DontNoodles@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      What is the typical power requirement on these devices? Can it be used to set up IoT sensor nodes in the wild where they work off solar, or do they need periodic tuning/care?

      • mesa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 days ago

        I’m running about 1w per device ATM.

        So yeah it sips energy. There’s a lot of nodes in the mountains that are solar powered. They work.

      • captainastronaut@seattlelunarsociety.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        Very low and yes. They work great for IoT, as long as it’s not mission critical stuff as messages can get dropped or arrive out of order sometimes. But for something like monitoring a remote sensor station that’s within the Lora range, without needing a cellular plan, yes.

    • Bubs@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      What is the range of a device like this? Is there any chance of using a mesh system like that if you’re not in a city? I’m about 30 miles away from a few towns, so there’s little chance for repeaters to be nearby.

      • mesa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        Theoretically you can get 50 ish miles or more with line of sight. In practice, you can get around 10 ish with repeaters. With around 30 devices, our city has effective coverage.

        You also have options to use MQTT if you want to make sure a message gets through. But that requires an internet connection.

        • shadshack@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          What about without line of sight? If I get one of these is it going to work while it’s sitting on my desk, or am I going to have to mount some antennas on the roof to actually make it usable? The maps only show like three other people in my city with one, so I’m not sure how useful this will actually be for me.

  • Curious Canid@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    My wife and I each have a radio, as do several of my friends. They’re handy for anything where you may not have cell coverage, like camping. We also use them at protests, to avoid the heavy surveillance that’s being done on cell networks. Even if the authorities start looking at Meshtastic, everything except the public channel uses PGP end-to-end encryption, and there is no middleman that has access to the unencrypted data.

    We have also put up a repeater node. It’s on top of a house at the top of the highest ridge near us. Before it went up we rarely saw more than our own nodes. Now we see several dozen, and sometimes a lot more. And the repeater serves the whole community, not just us. The beauty of a mesh is that everyone contributes to everyone else’s coverage.

    The mesh in our city is growing rapidly right now. Not only are there a lot of people getting their own nodes, there are a surprising number of people putting up repeaters to help spread the coverage. It’s amazing to watch our whole neighborhoods suddenly appear as gaps are filled in.