• 0 Posts
  • 9 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: January 26th, 2024

help-circle


  • I couldn’t remember it either. I described it to deepseek in order to find it. Ironically it mistakenly thought

    the short story you’re thinking of is almost certainly “Nanny” by Cory Doctorow. It’s part of his collection Radicalized (published in 2019)".

    If you find it, let me know. I think I might have been conned by deepseek.

    spoiler

    Why the Mix-Up?

    • Both works critique technology-driven capitalism, but Doctorow’s focus is distinct:

      • Radicalized targets corporate control via IoT devices, insurance cruelty, and policing 612.

      • Manna explores algorithmic worker management leading to dystopian/utopian outcomes.

    • I incorrectly merged these narratives due to overlapping themes of technological oppression. My apologies for the oversight.


  • They would generate strategies that maximize their objective function based on the training data. Obviously garbage in garbage out, but my point is they would not be prone to certain irrationalities like humans.

    It might be possible to regulate how AI CEOs are optimized and trained though. You can tell a human CEO a thousand times “we only have one earth, if you all externalize your cost we will all die and have zero profits” but an AI might actually get it. AI might also be connected to a kind of crowdsourced democratic economic global forum, where people can discuss, complain and make suggestions.

    AI also has a much higher bandwidth and might catch institutional problems much easier because it doesn’t have to rely on summaries of subordinates to understand how things are going.

    More broadly, it might be theoretically impossible for humans to act according to our shared values - no matter what rules, institutions, education or culture we create. Like “theoretically impossible, the system always degenerates” because individual humans will always follow their own greed and lust for power while pretending to comply, and then using that power to slowly pervert the system and it’s rules. I believe that is the root of our current malaise. But even non-sentient AI might be able to help us just enough to make it work. It’s much more likely that those in power will use it for the opposite, but that shouldn’t stop us from thinking about if it can be used for good.