• Voytrekk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    7 days ago

    It would be the largest cost cutting measure, but the ruling class won’t allow it.

    • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      7 days ago

      It might even make smarter decisions. The last few companies I worked for had total morons for CEOs, but they sure maximized short-term profit (by burning the company down).

      • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        I suspect an AI CEO would be more rational and science driven, instead of believing in some ideology that says workers have to feel desperate to be most productive or something. It’s possible they’d look at science and then raise the minimum vacation time so people are more productive and generate more profit.

          • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            They would generate strategies that maximize their objective function based on the training data. Obviously garbage in garbage out, but my point is they would not be prone to certain irrationalities like humans.

            It might be possible to regulate how AI CEOs are optimized and trained though. You can tell a human CEO a thousand times “we only have one earth, if you all externalize your cost we will all die and have zero profits” but an AI might actually get it. AI might also be connected to a kind of crowdsourced democratic economic global forum, where people can discuss, complain and make suggestions.

            AI also has a much higher bandwidth and might catch institutional problems much easier because it doesn’t have to rely on summaries of subordinates to understand how things are going.

            More broadly, it might be theoretically impossible for humans to act according to our shared values - no matter what rules, institutions, education or culture we create. Like “theoretically impossible, the system always degenerates” because individual humans will always follow their own greed and lust for power while pretending to comply, and then using that power to slowly pervert the system and it’s rules. I believe that is the root of our current malaise. But even non-sentient AI might be able to help us just enough to make it work. It’s much more likely that those in power will use it for the opposite, but that shouldn’t stop us from thinking about if it can be used for good.

        • Evil_Incarnate@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          It’s also possible that they work people until they die, as all the AI from companies communicate and if you get fired from one, you can’t get work anymore. People are a resource that keeps regenerating after all.

          • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            People are a resource that keeps regenerating after all.

            That’s what the AI would call “sustainable business practices”?

  • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    7 days ago

    Huh I read a dystopian short story about AI micro-managing workers, constantly telling them what to do next to optimize productivity. It ends with near “perfect” dystopian wealth concentration. While in another part of the world they used AI to create a utopia.

    Oh it was called Manna by Marshall Brain

    The gradual takeover of jobs by AI (starting with fast food), The warehousing of the unemployed in state-controlled facilities, A techno-utopian alternative (Australia) where AI liberates rather than enslaves.

    • Silinde@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Wow, I remember finding that story 20-odd years ago but could never remember the title or author. Pretty good short story IIRC, and more relevant than ever, it’s themes have been on my mind on and off quite a bit these past few years.

      • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I couldn’t remember it either. I described it to deepseek in order to find it. Ironically it mistakenly thought

        the short story you’re thinking of is almost certainly “Nanny” by Cory Doctorow. It’s part of his collection Radicalized (published in 2019)".

        If you find it, let me know. I think I might have been conned by deepseek.

        spoiler

        Why the Mix-Up?

        • Both works critique technology-driven capitalism, but Doctorow’s focus is distinct:

          • Radicalized targets corporate control via IoT devices, insurance cruelty, and policing 612.

          • Manna explores algorithmic worker management leading to dystopian/utopian outcomes.

        • I incorrectly merged these narratives due to overlapping themes of technological oppression. My apologies for the oversight.

  • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I actually think an AI would do a better job at running corporations than a human would. Even if it’s just an LLM. And I don’t mean in a pro-corpo way.

    • sheogorath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 days ago

      I have this sneaking suspicion that the company I work for is already ran by an LLM. The CEO is obviously using ChatGPT for everything.

    • Wolf@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      My cousin was fired from his job. The manager told him that AI had determined that he was to be fired, and that it was out of his hands. Either that was a true statement or it was a convenient excuse. Kind of scary either way.

  • MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 days ago

    This is what I told my bosses when AI first showed up and they called a meeting to discussed how to leverage it.

    It’s not going to replace me, it’s going to replace you.

    • pticrix@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 days ago

      Delamain has shown me more loyalty and care than 99% of NC. I’m on board.

      • Alaik@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        I mean honestly… delamain was honest. Which absolutely was better than 99% of night city. You get shot? Yeah he won’t take you to the hospital if his client paid him to take you to location z, but you knew that before getting in.

        You get the creds for the primo package yourself though? You got it made choom.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Plot twist: board replaces the whole exec layer with CEO AI, keeps the difference, gives nothing to the employees, line goes up, employees now threatened both at the top and the bottom of the ladder, work-work!

    • Evil_Incarnate@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      When manual workers were replaced by robots, they were told to “retrain and reskill” to get new jobs.

      Perhaps these CEO’s can retrain to be plumbers, there’s good money there.

  • Jack@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Does it use AI to generate quotes?

    Nevermind, it seems to be using predefined quotes.

    • Renat@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      It uses predefined quotes. I got 2 times same quote about thinking outside box.