Also known as snooggums on midwest.social and kbin.social.
Or if you are set on using AI Overviews to research products, then be intentional about asking for negatives and always fact-check the output as it is likely to include hallucinations.
If it is necessary to fact check something every single time you use it, what benefit does it give?
Jesus Christ, I just thought it was a shitty metaphor.
Smuggling is moving physical goods from one place to another, not advertising. That is why I think it is important to just call it advertising.
Why are you trying to read some kind of negative intent into my differing opinion that is fundamentally the same as yours, but with a minor difference?
What hill do you think I’m on?
My point was that they were advertising and it should be treated as advertising, including any legal pushments for advertising to children. Advertising doesn’t involve ‘smuggling’ or other words that make zero sense in this context that make it sound like it isn’t advertising.
Vampire Recreational Coffins?
Oh, so metaverse not Metaverse.
Yeah, that isn’t confusing and stupid.
Nothing is being ‘smuggled’.
They are just advertising. Regular old advertising which should have the same rules applied as any other advertising.
Apparently it mostly appeals to young children, or maybe people pretending to be young children.
more than half of the metaverse’s active users are aged 13 and below.
They could choose to curate the content itself to leave out the shitty stuff, or only include it when it is nlclearly a negative, or a bunch of other ways to improve the quality of the data used.
They choose not to.
Chatgpt and other llms aren’t smart at all. They just parrot out what is fed into them.
smuggled into virtual spaces
Words don’t mean anything anymore.
It is very user friendly, at least for reliability and security if you keep it in a safe location. It is cumbersome and slow.
Plus it isn’t just about the literal stuff, it is about not letting her have any stuff. Like if he didn’t keep everything, then he would see himself as ‘losing’.
It’s petty selfishness all the way down.
All styles have some variation within them.
Because the tech he makes is inherently terrible and despite being used in a positive way it is still centralized and ripe for misuse by people like Musk. On top of that the long term feasibility is based on advertising potential to get the funding.
He says positive stuff most of the time but his actions are the opposite. Blusky is supposed to be decentralized, but the structure as it exists requires it to actually be centralized when implemented. Plus his most recent ‘secure’ thing wasn’t even tested for security issues because he is a hype man who constantly lies.
Not really, I have stepped in dogshit was better than Zuck.
Jack Dorsey should just fucking stop.
Previous presidents didn’t load up the emergency docket with unconstitutional overreaches.
No, they don’t have to use defective technology just becsuse everyone else is.