If they gained root access to the container, that’s not a moderate vulnerability. Root inside a container is still root. You can still access the kernel with root privs and it’s the same kernel as the host.
Docker is not a virtual machine.
If they gained root access to the container, that’s not a moderate vulnerability. Root inside a container is still root. You can still access the kernel with root privs and it’s the same kernel as the host.
Docker is not a virtual machine.
What sets Lisuan apart from past Chinese GPU attempts is its claim of building the TrueGPU architecture from scratch
…and on the first go they get 4060 performance.
Pull the other one.
You’re right. It’s not, but that’s what you’re labelled when you stand against it.
It’s less of a left - right thing (that’s mainly economics). It paternalism Vs liberty thing. Labour have always had a very strong “we must protect the populace” theme to their policies. Conservatives have it too, but they want to do it in a different way.
Sadly it’s a really difficult thing to stand against. Who wants to be labelled the person enabling paedophiles, when all you want is the right to private communication.
https://proton.me/blog/lumo-ai
Read the Building EuroStack for the Future section
In their AI announcement yesterday they mentioned that they are moving to the EU because of legal protections.
They stream data from it while you play, so if you don’t have an SSD you’ll get pauses in game play.
You know that over-the-air update facility you all loved?
Errr … there’s a downside.
…and it’s turned them into the state with the highest standard of living in the US…right?
They just assumed a constant draw I think.
No, but I don’t think you’re appreciating how difficult it would be to fill that 3%. It’s not just about having 3% more power from something. It’s having it at the right time. It needs to be on demand. Having something on demand that has to cover all it’s costs selling just 3% isn’t easy.
It’s more resilient to have mixed supply where multiple types of generation take a proportion. Then when one falls short another can scale up a little.
If somebody has to keep that gas generator serviced only to run it on winter mornings, that electricity is going to be very pricey.
there’s just no market demand for it
Oh… There’s demand for it for sure.
The image generation models that exist are unquestionable proof of demand for penises. I think what’s missing is the kahunas required to make a business around it. There are places even pornographers fear to tread.
You know how when you look at a picture of someone and you cover up the clothed bits, they look naked. Your brain fills in the gaps with what it knows of general human anatomy.
It’s like that.
That could be a socially healthy place to end up at. I don’t see it anytime soon though. Just look at the other response I got.
Disagree. Not CSAM when no abuse has taken place.
That’s my point.
Honestly I think we need to understand that this is no different to sticking a photo of someone’s head on a porn magazine photo. It’s not real. It’s just less janky.
I would categorise it as sexual harassment, not abuse. Still serious, but a different level
I’d be interested on a study there.
I lot of therapy is taking emotions and verbalising them so that the rational part of the brain can help in dealing with things. Even a journal can help with that, so talking to an inanimate machine doesn’t seem stupid to me.
However therapists guide the conversation to challenge the patient, break reinforcing cycles, but in a way that doesn’t cause trauma. A chatbot isn’t going to be the same.
So I think, but I’m not sure, this is for group chats. Group chats are only encrypted to/from the server because the server broadcasts the message to each recipient. As the messages are unencrypted on the server, they can feed them to LLMs.
This is different to Signal. On Signal it’s your phone encrypting each copy of the message before sending to each recipient individually.
What I’m saying is something about the story doesn’t add up.
Either Microsoft classified a major issue as a minor one so they didn’t have to payout the bug bounty (quite possible), or the attack didn’t achieve what the researchers thought it did and Microsoft classified it according to it’s actual results.