• Turret3857@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Can’t wait to see this bad boy on serverpartdeals in a couple years if I’m still alive

    • Konstant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      if I’m still alive

      That goes without saying, unless you anticipate something. Do you?

  • zapzap@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    This hard drive is so big that when it sits around the house, it sits around the house.

  • mrvictory1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 days ago

    Me who stores important data on seagate external HDD with no backup reading the comments roasting seagate:

  • solrize@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    123
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Well, largest this week. And

    Yeah, $800 isn’t a small chunk of change, but for a hard drive of this capacity, it’s monumentally cheap.

    Nah, a 24TB is $300 and some 20TB’s are even lower $ per TB.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I paid $600+ for a 24 TB drive, tax free. I feel robbed. Although I’m glad not to shop at Newegg.

      • PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yes, fuck Newegg (and amazon too). I’ve been using B&H for disks and I have no complaints about them. They have the Seagate Ironwolf Pro 24TB at $479 currently, but last week it was on sale for $419. (I only look at 5yr warranty disks.)

        I was not in a position to take advantage as I’ve already made my disk purchase this go around, so I’ll wait for the next deep discount to hit if it is timely.

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Christ, remember when NewEgg was an actual store? Now they’re just a listing service for the scum-level of retailer and drop shippers. What a shame.

        • solrize@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          I hate amazon but haven’t been following stuff about newegg and have been buying from them now and then. No probs so far but yeah, B&H is also good. Also centralcomputer.com if you are in the SF bay area. Actual stores.

          • PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            4 days ago

            Newegg was the nerd’s paradise 10+ years ago. I would spend thousands each year on my homelab back then. They had great customer service and bent over backwards for them. Then they got bought out and squeezed and passed that squeeze right down to the customers. Accusing customers of damaging parts, etc. Lots of slimeball stuff. They also wanted to be like amazon, so they started selling beads, blenders and other assorted garbage alongside tech gear.

            After a couple of minor incidents with them I saw the writing on the wall and went to amazon who were somewhat okay then. Once amazon started getting bad, I turned to B&H and fleaBay. I don’t buy as much electronic stuff as I used to, but when I do these two are working…so far.

    • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      Omg I really have been out of the loop. I originally filled my 8 bay NAS with 6tb drives starting back in 2018. Once they would fill, i added another. 3 years ago, I finally ran out of space and started swapping out the 6tb for 10tb. Due to how it works, I needed to do 2 before I saw any additional space. I think i have 3 or 4 now, and the last one was 2 years ago. They did cost around $250 at the time, and I think i got 1 for just over $200. The fact that I can more than double that for only $300 is crazy news to me. Guess I am going to stop buying 10tb now. The only part that sucks is having to get 2 up front…

    • Armand1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I got some 16TB drives recently for around $200 each, though they were manufacturer recertified. Usually a recertified drive will save you 20-40%. Shipping can be a fortune though.

      EDIT: I used manufacturer recertified, not refurbished drives.

        • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          4 days ago

          I would absolutely not use refurbs personally. As part of the refurb process they wipe the SMART data which means you have zero power-on hours listed, zero errors, rewrite-count, etc - absolutely no idea what their previous life was.

          • Glitchvid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            If you’ve got a RAID array with 1 or 2 parity then manufacturer recertified drives are fine; those are typically drives that just aged out before being deployed, or were traded in when a large array upgraded.

            If you’re really paranoid you should be mixing mfg dates anyway, so keep some factory new and then add the recerts so the drive pools have a healthy split.

            • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              4 days ago

              Yep staggering manufacturing dates is a good suggestion. I do it but it does make purchasing during sales periods to get good prices harder. Better than losing multiple drives at once, but RAID needs a backup anyway and nobody should skip that step.

              • Glitchvid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 days ago

                I mean a backup of a RAID pool is likely just another RAID pool (ideally off-site) – maybe a tape library if you’ve got considerable cash.

                Point is that mfg refurbs are basically fine, just be responsible, if your backup pool runs infrequently then that’s a good candidate for more white label drives.

        • Armand1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          As mentioned by another user, all drives fail, it’s a matter of when, not if. Which is why you should always use RAID arrangement with at least one redundant drive and/or have full backups.

          Ultimately, it’s a money game. If you save 30% on a recertified drive and it has 20% less total life than a new one, you’re winning.

          Here’s where I got some.

          https://serverpartdeals.com/collections/manufacturer-recertified-drives

          I looked around a bit, and either search engines suck nowadays (possibly true regardless) or there are no independent studies comparing certified and new drives.

          All you get mostly opinion pieces or promises by resellers that actually, their products are good. Clearly no conflict of interest there. /s

          The best I could find was this, but that’s not amazing either.

          What I do is look at backblaze’s drive stats for their new drives, find a model that has a good amount of data and low failure rate, then get a recertified one and hope their recertification process is good and I don’t get a lemon.

          • Anivia@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            And usually by the time they break they have been obsolete anyways, at least for 24/7 use in a NAS where storage density and energy efficiency are a big concern. So you would have replaced most of them long before they break, even with recertified drives

    • JordanZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Depends on your use case. The linked drive according to seagate’s spec sheet is only rated for about ~6.5 power-on hours per day(2400 per year). So if just in your desktop for storage then sure. In an always (or mostly) on NAS then I’d find a different drive. It’ll work fine but expect higher failure rates for that use.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      More like zero, cause modern AAA games require an NVME (or at least an SSD) and this is a good old fashioned 7200 RPM drive.

        • Psythik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          A lot of modern AAA games require an SSD, actually.

          On top of my head: Cyberpunk, Marvel’s Spider-Man 2, Hogwarts Legacy, Dead Space remake, Starfield, Baulder’s Gate 3, Palworld, Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart

          • TyrantTW@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            4 days ago

            Indeed, as others have said this isn’t a hard requirement. Anyone with a handheld (e.g. Steam Deck) playing off a uSD card uses a device that’s an order of magnitude slower for sequential I/O

            • Psythik@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              I can personally guarantee that it is a hard requirement for Spider-Man and Ratchet

                • Psythik@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Okay well try telling that to my computer when the games wouldn’t run without constantly freezing to load assets every few seconds.

            • wewbull@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              They stream data from it while you play, so if you don’t have an SSD you’ll get pauses in game play.

              • tobogganablaze@lemmus.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                Sure, you might.

                But Baulder’s Gate 3 for example, which claims to require an SSD in it’s system requirements runs just fine on a HDD.

                It’s the developer making sure you get optimal performance.

          • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            Both Cyberpunk and BG3 work flawlessly on the external USB hard drive that I use. The loading times suffer a bit, but not to an unplayable degree, not even close

          • RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Forza Horizon 4 and 5 don’t say they require an SSD I think, but when I had it on my hard drive any cars that did over 250kph caused significant world loading issues, as in I’d fall out of the world because it didn’t load the map.

            • Psythik@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Forza Horizon 4 actually does include an SSD in its requirements. Thank you for reminding me about that.

              • RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                It does technically work without it, just don’tgo over A class, don’t do sprints and there was 1 normal circuit that’s a tad big in a forest bit

                • Psythik@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  If a game isn’t fully playable without an SSD, then I consider it a requirement.

                  Ever try playing Perfect Dark without an Expansion Pak back in the day? It’ll technically work, but you’ll get locked out of 90% of the game, including the campaign. Similar thing with SSDs today.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      Nah, the other stuff will all fit on your computer’s hard drive, this is only for porn. They should call it the Porn Drive.

      • Wolf@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I “only” have a 1TB SDD. If I wanted to download a new game I would have to delete one that’s already on here.

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      It isn’t as much as you think, high resolution, high bitrate video files are pretty large.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        high resolution, high bitrate video files are pretty large.

        Can it actually transfer data fast enough to save or play them back in real-time, though?

  • daggermoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    I wanna fuck this HDD. To have that much storage on one drive when I currently have ~30TB shared between 20 drives makes me very erect.

  • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    It will take about 36 hours to fill this drive at 270mb/s

    That’s a long time to backup your giraffe porn collection.