• 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    I kinda don’t want anyone other than a doctor determining it, tbh. Fuck the human bean counters just as much as the AI ones.

    Hopefully we can just start growing organs instead of having to even make such a grim decision and everyone can get new livers. Even if they don’t need them.

  • kemsat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yeah. It’s much more cozy when a human being is the one that tells you you don’t get to live anymore.

          • kemsat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            17 days ago

            No, I think whenever it’s up to someone else, without my permission, it’s always bad.

            Edit: as in I’d rather not have someone else choose when I die. That’s between me & physics or god or the universe or something that isn’t some other person.

              • kemsat@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                15 days ago

                I wasn’t talking about the kidneys that time, more generally about others deciding who dies

  • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    What are you going to train it off of since basic algorithms aren’t sufficient? Past committee decisions? If that’s the case you’re hard coding whatever human bias you’re supposedly trying to eliminate. A useless exercise.

    • Giooschi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      A slightly better metric to train it on would be chances of survival/years of life saved thanks to the transplant. However those also suffer from human bias due to the past decisions that influenced who got a transpant and thus what data we were able to gather.

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        And we do that with basic algorithms informed by research. But then the score gets tied and we have to decide who has the greatest chance of following though on their regimen based on things like past history and means to aquire the medication/go to the appointments/follow a diet/not drink. An AI model will optimize that based on wild demographic data that is correlative without being causative and end up just being a black box racist in a way that a committee that has to clarify it’s thinking to other members couldn’t, you watch.