They call it “dark traffic” - ads that are not seen by tech-savvy users who have excellent ad blockers.

Not surprised that its growing. The web is unusable without an ad blocker and its only getting worse, and will continue to get worse every month.

  • DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Maybe if they didn’t use very intrusive ads people would not install ad-blockers so much

    Many website put a video playing in later in top of the text, with another layer of ads and tiny space to read… the website would be unreadable without ad-blocks

    • Glog78@digitalcourage.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      @DarkSideOfTheMoon @1984 and all this additional JavaScript and Elements and makes the side’s just horrible slow. Compare this with CSS+HTML only sides omg how good they can feel … I also prefer nowadays text mode browsers again, cause a good readable font + focus on what is important … the content itself. I really get pissed if websites with public content can’t be run anymore without javascript (wtf is up with you guys ?) …

  • canajac@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    25 years of adblockers and that is the single most important thing that keeps me from cutting myself off the web. I’ve donated money to adblockers and will continue to do so until I die! I send emails to the web sites that ask me to remove the blocker to tell them I will not and that there are many other sites that welcome my adblocking ass!

  • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The use of the term “Dark traffic” here is to paint the use of ad-blockers as something nefarious. Don’t use it, fuck these people right in their stupid mouths.

    I propose using the terms “clean traffic”, for ad-blocked website traffic, and “dogshit traffic” for everything else.

    • grueling_spool@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Maybe we could turn it around: adblockers are tools that block ads and other kinds of dark traffic such as trackers and malicious scripts.

    • x0x7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 hours ago

      They are so short sighted to. Ad blocker help advertizers. It allows sites to fill up sites with ads to the point of being unusable while not losing 100% of traffic. That keeps these site relevant enough that old people who don’t have ad blockers end up there too when they follow links or google ranks a site high because it has traffic.

      If they got rid of all ad block somehow they would have to decrease the ads because I wouldn’t use the web. Or online communities would be way more conscious of the ad level of the things they link to.

      • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The tech community is pacified into not taking action against the polluters by our adblockers because we don’t see the egregious ads and so we don’t fight the good fight for the user.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Ad blockers are the fight. Those users who can’t be bothered to learn a bit about the devices they spend so much time on aren’t owed anything.

          What does “fighting the good fight” even look like to you in this context, anyways?

          • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            those users who can’t be bothered to learn
            snooty tech elitism

            What does “fighting the good fight” even look like to you in this context, anyways?
            We built the entire infrastucture, we can poison it’s business model.

            When the first banner ad appeared on the web, the condemnation was not loud enough and it was allowed to fester.
            At this points these entities have become large enough that the evil practice that could have been snuffed out, is now being accepted.
            Now every slimey thing on the internet is due for the mother of all crackdowns. Something like the GDPR times 911.

            I’m not in the mood for centrist technocratic measured solution at the moment.
            If it makes more than a million a year and it’s using any kind of psychological tactics,
            that’s advertising, sponsored search, dark patterns, then BURN IT ALL DOWN

            • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              34 minutes ago

              The tech community came up with a technical solution to the ad problem. If the solution you’re looking for isn’t technical, why is your focus on the tech community?

              Anyone can learn this shit. Use any search engine, type “how to block internet ads”, and you’ll see results with “firefox” and “ublock origin”, that can then be put into “how to get” follow up searches.

              The current state of ads is being accepted by those who don’t block them. Everyone who does block them (or refuses to visit ad cancer sites) has cut off that source of revenue, but those who just choose to accept the default option enable them by not just seeing the ads but even sometimes clicking them and buying shit.

  • pachrist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The web has almost always been unusable without an adblocker. Ads today are less malicious, but more insidious. Clicking the wrong ad in 2003 would brick your computer. Clicking the wrong ad today means you’ll have to cancel a credit card after your personal data is compiled and sold on the black market.

    Nothing new. Ads don’t fuel a free internet. They fuel a business model. The free internet is fueled by the time and donations of kind, dedicated people.

    • A Wild Mimic appears!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      There was a time in the 90’s where ads were mostly banners, and that was fine; google’s text-only ads were completely acceptable.

      But that didn’t last long - it went downhill with the proliferation of popups, especially the nefarious kind which created even more popups or tried to stop the user from closing them, and usage of dialog boxes.

      And whoever was the first person to add sound to an ad, i wish you and your entire family tree that your genitalia translocate to your forehead.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Ads in the 90’s and 00’s would just layer toolbars onto your browser. Is still have a a nervous twitch when I see a thick toolbars or animated cursors.

        • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 hour ago

          The toolbars came from scam software on the '90s. Ads being able to install things came well into the '00s.

          • A Wild Mimic appears!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 hour ago

            yeah, there was quite a long time where useful software was bundled with toolbars or, the worse option, malware that hijacked your browser, which was a pain in the ass to remove. I was the techie in the family, and i got pretty good with tools like hijackthis and knowing by heart what services and background programs should start on a standard win98 or xp installation. (in this time i also was THE guy to ask at my job when issues with 56k modems came up, diagnosing a lot of issues by listening to the dial-up tones)

    • elvis_depresley@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Ads don’t fuel a free internet. They fuel a business model. The free internet is fueled by the time and donations of kind, dedicated people.

      I believe this to be true.

    • buttnugget@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      My view is that if we can’t have the things we want without ads, then we need a new business model. I’m not super into the whole kindness and donations model. If we need it to be state funded, so be it.

    • x0x7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      You store your credit card in your computer? If browser credit card management isn’t secure enough to avoid that attack you shouldn’t be using it.

  • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    “The growth of dark traffic undermines the ability of publishers to fund the production of quality content, or even operate as a business. We must recognise users are not the main driver causing this.”

    And Scott Messer, founder of publishing adtech consultancy Messer Media, added: “Dark traffic is unlike anything we have seen before. It’s demonetising publisher content at scale without user consent.

    Are they trying to present it as if poor innocent users need to be protected from the vile ad blockers?

    • 1984@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      48 minutes ago

      They always care about us when they are losing money arent they…

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Definitely. They are likely laying the groundwork to make using an adblocker a criminal offense.

  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    This is easily solved by not using 3rd parties and tracking data for ads. If the ad was just part of the page (similar to an ad in the newspaper) then ad blockers would not be able to detect them at all. A YouTuber saying “before we get started, this video is sponsored by [relevant related company]” does not get blocked by ad blockers.

    However, in order to do that websites would be responsible for the ads they display. If they don’t do their due diligence they won’t be able to pass it off as “we’re not responsible for it, it’s our ad company that put it there.” They don’t want to be responsible for the ads they show, but they want you to be responsible for the ads you don’t watch.

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      A YouTuber saying “before we get started, this video is sponsored by [relevant related company]” does not get blocked by ad blockers.

      Well, there’s sponsor block which uses crowd sourced timestamps to skip those segments, but yeah you’re right.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    i know this may go against the general attitude here but i gotta say this does make me a little sad when i think about it. and i use adblockers as well, but i never knew what the numbers were. when it’s put into context like this it’s hard not to be discouraged by the fact that this is still probably a minority of users. i mean what the hell, how are people still using the internet with ads turned on.

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It would have to be millenials since Gen z exist almost entirely in the walled garden of a phone app.

      Most people now a days don’t even use a desktop with a browser. I honestly expect that most of what they are “seeing” is just web scrapers for the LLM. Those are likely to “block” ads simply based on efficiency, since it shows down crawling.

        • ZeffSyde@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 hours ago

          It honestly creeps me out that so many people don’t curate what they watch and just consume whatever ‘their feed’ puts in front of them.

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I used to maintain a website for a bicycling club in my county that was great for getting people into biking, getting people out the house, making friends, and staying fit.

    We had a banner ad along the top of the site for a local bicycle/bicycle repair shop that aided the club a lot and was very reasonable.

    He got something out of it (publicity and a seal of approval towards the value/quality of his work), and we got something out of it (money to run the site, and a bit left over for things like puncture repair kits and the occasional celebratory drink after an arduous ride).

    Nobody bats an eyelid to those ads. They are reasonable.

    What we have now isn’t that. What we have now is an insecure, malware-infested privacy nightmare that ruins webpages and stresses everybody out.

    Use Firefox + uBlock origin for your own sanity. Don’t let big tech make you feel guilty for not going along with their game.

    • ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Use Firefox + uBlock origin for your own sanity. Don’t let big tech make you feel guilty for not going along with their game.

      100% this and also, consider allow-listing specific sites which deserve your support, or better yet, contribute directly if you can – e.g. your local bike club forum, your local newspaper, a blogger whose work you enjoy, etc., assuming of course, the ads are reasonable.

    • Tiger666@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Guilty? Hahahahahaha

      They will never make me feel guilty because they are the guilty ones. Guilty of greed and of destroying our society. Fuck big advetisers. They would put billboards in outre space if they thought it would make them a tenth of a penny more in profit.

      I dont even consider them human to be honest.

  • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 hours ago

    US trade association News/Media Alliance announced it had secured the takedown of 12ft.io

    Oh thats why that stopped working. Bunch of jerks.

  • Kyden Fumofly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I used my mother’s laptop once 2 years ago, and i was like, how the fuck do you people browsing without an adblock?