• ubergeek@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    Except StarLink cannot possibly provide the same bandwidth, latency, and throughput a fiber connection can. Because of physics.

    I can either share my 10G symmetrical connection with nobody, or with 200 others.

    And, Fiber costs me $70 a month. Starlink, with worse performance, costs 4x more.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        That’s the point. Musk wants control over the entire internet.

        If all the other internet infrastructure was abandoned, he would be the most powerful person in history. Want to regulate him afterwards? He could just shut down the internet in your region until you accept his terms.

        • iridebikes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          He has already meddled in the Ukraine war doing things like this, too. He turned off Starlink during an offensive Ukrainian mission. He claims he had to because civilian systems aren’t allowed to be used for a foreign incursion into Russia and that he’d face consequences. Which is a complete lie.

        • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          Musk wants control over the entire internet.

          This is the number one reason my friend and I refused to even consider StarLink. We don’t live in the US and do not want all our traffic going through there.

    • utopiah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      Because of physics.

      Pfff, physics, pesky detail! Clearly you are not a true visionary like Musk! /s