• Dr. Unabart@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    30 minutes ago

    DB’s a fkn mess. Prices go up, reliability goes into the toilet. And there’s not a single thing anyone can do about it aside from finding another way. I want trains to be awesome. They are far from it, post-pandemic.

    • kebab@endlesstalk.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 minutes ago

      FlixTrain in Germany is much cheaper. Reliability is still the issue but at least I feel like I get what I pay for, contrary to DB

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I would think most Americans that have ever been on a decent high speed train would as well. Such a better experience than the life-sucking horror of modern air travel.

  • Asetru@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yeah, no shit… Just go to your nearest station 5 minutes before departure instead of wasting hours in security checks and at gates sounds terrific.

    The last time I booked an internaional ICE from northern Germany to Bruxelles, the return connection and its follow up connection were cancelled. Best connection to get back would have been a Eurostar but tickets weren’t transferable and the guy at the station wouldn’t even sell me one. Had to take three short distance trains just to cross the border back to Germany, ended up about five hours late.

    National trains are often a mess already but with international connections you’re just lost. Booking night trains would be awesome, go to bed in Hamburg and wake up in Barcelona sounds like a dream. Instead, they all go to Vienna, which is nice to go there but isn’t helpful for European connectivity as a whole.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Yeah, no shit… Just go to your nearest station 5 minutes before departure instead of wasting hours in security checks and at gates sounds terrific.

      I just wish some rail companies (DB 🤡) wouldn’t fuck this up with pricing structures copied from air travel that make tickets bought on the day of travel usually prohibitively expensive.

      • Redditquaza@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yeah for real, I once had to pay close to 180€ for a second class ticket from Berlin to Cologne without a seat reservation since I had to buy it only a few hours in advance.

    • Don Antonio Magino@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      National rail can be (at least) perfectly decent, which it is in the Netherlands. Too bad the EU wants to have it be fucked up by ‘competition’: the European Commission just now sued the Dutch state for giving the consession for the main part of the railway network to the national rail company NS.

      • bluGill@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 day ago

        Competition is good, but railroads are a natural monopoly - there are very few points in the world that can justify more than one set of tracks between them. Airplanes can share an airport because if someone else blocks a runway everyone else can take a different one and thus there can be competition. However if train operator B blocks a track (possibly by running a slow train) everyone else can’t get through.

        I’m all for competition, but you have to own your own tracks.

        • Don Antonio Magino@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          1 day ago

          In the Netherlands the actual railways are owned by a separate company that was split from NS after privatisation, ProRail.

          Railway competition is bullshit anyway. Neoliberal ideology pretends people constantly make informed decisions about what products they wish to buy. This is bullshit anyway, but with the railways especially. If you want to take the train to a specific place and arrive at a specific time, you will pretty much always have one option anyway. There is no choice. All the so-called ‘competition’ will do, is split up a currently contiguous network, which will probably introduce needless transfers to different train companies, where you currently have one.

          So-called ‘competition’ is a disaster for what should be a public service like the railways.

      • freebee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Dutch have good national trains but are also part of the reason for poor trains on European level. The Dutch have built next to nothing high speed tracks, NS also don’t invest in night trains.

        • brot@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          The netherlands are at max around 320km x 150km. They are also densly populated with major population centers there. You really do not need classical high speed rail like the TGV in that scenario

          • freebee@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            You do need that if you’re for example traveling from Amsterdam to Berlin, Copenhagen, Gothenburg etc, the kind of travel this article and post are about. Amsterdam to Berlin takes 7,5 hours, at least, by train that’s ridiculously slow for just 650 km. About 1/4 of that is in NL, runs through a part of NL which is not at all as densily populated as the Randstad is.

    • snowflocke@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      And waiting 5 hours for the Deutsche Bahn to arrive. I don’t really care for the prices but German trains are a nightmare to travel with

      • Cherry@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Kinda agree. Good when smooth, but when bad it’s bad.

        I once booked a train months in advance. Got there and the train got cancelled. No notice just not there. I waited in queue for 30 mins. Person told me catch the next one in 1 hour.

        I did. The conductor on the train came along and threaten to throw us off as it was not the correct ticket. There was just no rational option.

        Otherwise I love the train.

        • detren@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I think these days DB gives you a ticket that works on every train if there’s a delay that will make you lose your connection which is pretty neat, but worthless if you have an international connection 💀

    • megrania@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Night trains (the sleeper trains, not the ones where you have to sit and they go at night) sound great in theory but, after having taken one once, I’m not sure whether I’d enjoy it as a regular means of transportation.

      I don’t think it would scale and thus would always be pretty expensive.

      I had to push my heavy luggage up high into a compartment above the beds, and navigate in very tight quarters, which works fine if you’re young and have no back problems, but older folks might struggle.

      I traveled in a 2-bed compartment with my partner, not sure whether I’d enjoy a cramped 6-bed compartment.

      I’d much rather have a good connection in the morning and enough space on the train to use the trip as a work day (remote worker privilege, for sure) or reading day, and arrive in the evening, or, if the distance is very long, have affordable accommodation at the major train stations (not overpriced hostels with a club in the courtyard, which happened to me in Paris once).

      So all in all, I feel like the sleeper train thing seems more of a touristy event-thing than a regular mode of transportation, at least if other options are available …

      • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        I agree that if you travel with a lot of luggage the sleeper trains can be a bit cramped and there should be probably some sort of check in luggage for long distance trips.

        Otherwise the compartments seem fine? I definitly prefer them over some cheap and noisy hotel right at the train station.

    • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Barcelona in particular is a bit more difficult than the rest of Europe since we have a different rail standard in Spain.

      But also Barcelona in particular is very close to the french border. So making one connection there doesn’t sound too bad.

      • megrania@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sorry to disappoint you … in Barcelona-Sants, you have to go through one … not the body-scan thing yet, but you have to pass your luggage through a scanner, there’s a line, and you definitely have to bring some time, be there 20 min before at least …

        • Vincent@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Yeah hence the “mostly” - travelling to/from the UK is a similar hassle. Really not the direction I’m hoping train travel to move in…

    • remon@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Where are these airports with hours of security checks? I’ve never taken more than 15 minutes.

      • Asetru@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        It really depends. I’ve been to airports where it took me less than 10 minutes from the entry door to the gate. I’ve also been in security lines that took hours because of whatever. Unfortunately, the conditions usually state that you have to take this into account and should be at the airport at least 2 hours early, so that’s what I do to not miss my plane without being able to request a refund or something.

      • bluGill@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Big airports in the US often need you to arrive that far beforehand. The security line itself is often half an hour, then there is the other lines to check your baggage (if any) - these are generally quick, but still a line. From the door to your gate can often take most of an hour, but not all of the time is in security.

        Though I live in a tiny city, the security line is rarely long and there are only a few gates so I can get to my gate in less than half an hour most of the time. However I still arrive an hour in advance because at peak times the line will get long.

        • remon@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah, but this is about Europe. We know that US air travel is fucked. You have to take your shoes off, lol.

          • bluGill@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Taking shoes off only adds maybe a minute to the security time. Large airports in Europe need you to arrive an hour early as well to make it on time. Europe also has security lines - they works little different, but there are still lines. There are also baggage lines, and large airports need you to spend a lot of time to get to your gate.

            • remon@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              I’ve been in and out FRA a couple of times this year, which is a pretty big airport. Absolutely didn’t need to be an hour early, probably gonna cut it to 30 mins next time. Boarding takes longer than any security line.

  • oeuf@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    Trains are so much better in so many ways. The only mode of transport that can compete for me is boats.

  • EverXIII@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    Trains are still extremely expensive when compared to flights to the same destinations. Unfortunately…

    • Obi@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Even driving alone in my car is usually cheaper for the “usual” 6-12h drive distance. Let alone with passengers or if I pickup a blablacar. I’d love to do more train but it needs to be subsidized more for the prices to become reasonable, and that I can book shortly before my trips because in my branch it’s impossible for me to schedule the tickets so far ahead. I still have to deal with equipment to move around but that can be dealt with through rentals on location.

    • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      And multiply those costs for a family. Trains receive more subsidies per km in Europe but cost far more for the distance. I say this as someone who prefers trains. They’re just not that efficient compared to planes. There are solid use cases like local commuter trains and for shipping. For longer journeys, planes are a clear winner for time and cost.

      • shane@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Do planes have to pay tax on their fuel yet? Asking for a friend…

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        planes are a clear winner for time and cost.

        Artificially so.

      • freebee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes true but the range of how far train can be preferable above plane can be expanded if network better run on a European level and some big strategic investments (not that different from what France did in the 80’s and 90’s) on quite a few very often travelled routes. Amsterdam-Berlin is an easy example, but there are many like that. Currently on many routes the plane>train is like ~300 km, while on many that could become 600-700km with either high speed tracks or more sleeper train options or better connections. On some big routes the train>plane is up to 700-800 km already.

        • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I think I agree directionally but I keep coming back to the efficiency issue. The longer the journey, the more inefficient the cost becomes relative to planes. It scales linearly. More and more money would need to be poured into a less and less efficient transport method. Once you hit 4-600km, flying is almost always faster. Faster tracks and trains for direct routes are INCREDIBLY expensive to build and maintain and staff.

          • freebee@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I get your drift and there are definitely routes where that will always be the case. You can’t run trains from central or eastern Europe to Portugal competitively with airplanes, never. Same goes for islands like Malta, Corsica etc. But an important part of the equation is still also how heavily travelled a route is, and somewhat if that is year round the case or mainly (short) seasonal demand. Airplanes are more like busses, it’s easy to shift them around to meet a seasonal demand. But trains move a lot more people at once. A TGV can transport up to 550-600 people at once, 2 trains coupled that’s more than 1000 people at once. The ICE4 gets to above 800 people at once. Most main aircraft types are 250-300 people capacity. The flight itself is fast, but the entire travel often is not, because the train brings you to a city center while many airports are 20 or more km outside the cities and because of regulations (the airports are way stricter controlled) causing long waiting times. And the main reason of all, even if the airplane is faster and always will be: the climate impact. Tho railway is for sure not zero impact, airplanes according to most stuff I’ve read is still way way worse impact so making trains more attractive on year-round very often travelled medium distance routes still pays off. It should, for example, not be okay that the airplane is faster and cheaper between Amsterdam and Berlin. Yeah, it’s a bit more than 600 km, but it is a very often travelled route, year round, the geography and population density in between is very fit for high speed, the amount of stops in between could be very manageable (4 or 5), while it connects 2 very big population centers. But because of lack of investment on such a main route, it currently takes 6 hours by train. By airplane including check-in, security, being there early, etc it’s like 3,5 hours. It’s a really fine example of where train could become a lot more competitive with strategic investments with in the end a lower climate impact and lower dependency on imported fossil fuels (large electric planes are still a pipedream for now). Speed isn’t everything, it’s on many routes also just the lack of coordination between different national railways’ schedules making it a headache by train currently.

          • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            From a fuel efficiency point of view, trains are still way more efficient, and a dense coverage of airports is also extremely expensive to maintain.

            But it is also a bit unfair to compare prices of low cost airlines that use subsidized airports and tax exempted fuel to mostly state owned rail companies. A fairer comparison would be Lufthansa prices or vise versa Flixtrain.

            • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Trains are more fuel efficient, but there is a lot more which goes into the cost of these transport modes than fuel.

              I’m comparing these modes of transport because they both receive subsidies, including tax exemptions for avgas. The EU subsidises air travel (in many ways) to the tune of around €30–40 billion annually depending on what you include and what you consider to be a “subsidy.” Using similar criteria, rail is subsidised to the tune of €40–75 billion per year. So rail gets a lot more investment despite it serving 16% fewer travel kilometers per year in the EU than air travel.

    • RedPandaRaider@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Planes are not too cheap. Trains are too expensive.

      Only raising prices is neoliberal ideology. We need to lower prices on the things that are too expensive. Something being “too cheap” due to subsidies is a secondary concern.

    • kebab@endlesstalk.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I would rather see trains getting cheaper than planes getting more expensive though

        • trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Remember the days when railways were exclusively government run enterprises?

          Thanks to the neoliberal thieves selling off public property for short term profits, now we all can enjoy paying the ever raising prices for ever diminishing service.

      • coyootje@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I wish it was like that here in the Netherlands. Instead we get flights that stay more or less the same price due to heavy subsidies and constant bickering about the trains. They’ve already announced another 10% price hike on trains for the coming year, after already raising it by 5-10% every single year for the past few years. It’s insane. Add to that the extra inconvenience of having to cross borders with mediocre connections and I can understand that people don’t take the train.

    • LazyGit@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      Maxbe we should start requiring to pay tax on aviation fuel for starters? First step on fuel sold in the EU, then for fuel used to reach the EU…

  • trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Not only the reliability is an issue, all too often, traveling a longer distance by high speed train costs a small fortune compared to a flight of the same distance.